Paper

On Sleep-Wake Disorder Identification from Polysomnographic Representations

Alvise Dei Rossi, Luigi Fiorillo, Giuliana Monachino, Alessia Calzoni, Julia van der Meer, Markus H. Schmidt +3 more
arXiv 2610.174512026EEGEOGEMGECGResp
PreprintFirst posted: Oct 12, 2026Added to atlas: Oct 14, 2026Source
Citations—Not available
GitHub stars—Not available
HF downloads—Not available

Activity counts measure attention, not model quality. Missing counts are unknown. Publication status follows the linked source; a listed venue alone does not confirm peer review.

Compared: self-supervised PSG FMs SleepFM, OSF, Hypnos vs sleep-stage-supervised scorers U-Sleep and SleepTransformer (pretrained in the SLEEPYLAND protocol on ~220k h of expert-annotated PSG from 17 NSRR cohorts; EMG/ECG/RESP counterparts trained the same way). Downstream: linear probing and a missingness-aware coupled-Mamba state-space model; fixed patient-grouped 5-fold CV.

  • Venue: arXiv 2610.17451 (v1 2026-10-12, cs.LG)
  • Signals: EEG, EOG, EMG, ECG, respiration
  • Form factor: clinical
At a glance
Venue
arXiv 2610.17451 (v1 2026-10-12, cs.LG)
Published
2026
DOI
Not reported
PMID
Not reported
Licence
Not reported
Form factor
Clinical
Subjects
Not reported
Code
Not reported
Added
Oct 14, 2026

Abstract

Self-supervised polysomnography foundation models (PSG FMs) aim to capture clinically useful information beyond sleep staging, yet are rarely compared with sleep-staging encoders pretrained at comparable scale and modality coverage. Using a common whole-night, missingness-aware state-space downstream modeling framework, we compared frozen representations from prominent large-scale, multi-cohort sleep-stage-supervised encoders and self-supervised PSG FMs for multilabel identification of six sleep-wake and circadian disorder groups in 7,906 PSGs from an unseen registry. Although PSG FMs outperformed an EEG-only, single-cohort supervised baseline, this ordering reversed when supervised pretraining approached comparable scale and modality coverage. Transfer learning from neural sleep scorers achieved higher overall performance while exhibiting greater downstream data efficiency. These findings underscore the need for scale- and modality-matched pretrained supervised baselines when assessing PSG FMs' downstream potential.

Verbatim fromarXiv· arXiv metadata (abstracts are released under CC0)

On Sleep-Wake Disorder Identification from Polysomnographic Representations: ChatPPG research summary card

How it works

How Method works: Setup → Method → TargetSetup: Signals (EEG, EOG, EMG, ECG, respiration); Form factor (clinical). Method: Method (Transformer). Target: Sleep staging.SetupSignals: EEG, EOG, EMG, ECG, respirationSignalsEEG, EOG, EMG, ECG, respirationForm factor: clinicalForm factorclinicalMethod×NMethodTransformerTargetSleep stagingSleep staging

Cite

@article{psgfmvssleepscorerssleep2026,
  title = {{On Sleep-Wake Disorder Identification from Polysomnographic Representations}},
  author = {Alvise Dei Rossi and Luigi Fiorillo and Giuliana Monachino and Alessia Calzoni and Julia van der Meer and Markus H. Schmidt and Claudio L. A. Bassetti and Silvia Santini and Francesca Faraci},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {arXiv 2610.17451 (v1 2026-10-12, cs.LG)},
  eprint = {2610.17451},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.17451}
}

History

  1. Added to the ChatPPG research hub