Non-invasive glucose estimation leaderboard
PPG Signals for Blood Glucose Measurement (Kermani / Mendeley): MARD
9 reported results for non-invasive glucose estimation on PPG Signals for Blood Glucose Measurement (Kermani / Mendeley), ranked by MARD. Top reported: PLS…
This page ranks every result ChatPPG has recorded for non-invasive glucose estimation on PPG Signals for Blood Glucose Measurement (Kermani / Mendeley), measured by MARD (%) (lower is better). Each number is copied from the publication cited in its row, and ranks apply only within this dataset and metric.
| Rank | Method & evaluation | MARD (%)↓ Lower is better |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | PLS (Islam) PPG features + partial least squares (Islam et al. 2021 method) [reproduction] Evaluation detailsTrained on all VitalDB data, tested on the 67 MUST (Kermani) recordings (Supraja et al. 2026 out-of-distribution test). MUST glucose spans only 88-183 mg/dL, so mean prediction scores well; R² was below zero for every model. Reported as of: 2026-10-16 | 10.67 |
| 2 | MFCC + XGBoost (Prabha) MFCC features + XGBoost (Prabha et al. 2022 method) [reproduction] Evaluation detailsTrained on all VitalDB data, tested on the 67 MUST (Kermani) recordings (Supraja et al. 2026 out-of-distribution test). MUST glucose spans only 88-183 mg/dL, so mean prediction scores well; R² was below zero for every model. Reported as of: 2026-10-16 | 11.69 |
| 3 | ResNet34-1s ResNet34, 1 s segments (Zeynali et al. 2025) Evaluation detailsOriginal paper: trained on VitalDB (random 70/15/15 split), external test on the MUST (Kermani) dataset with 1 s peak-centred segments resampled to 100 Hz (Tables 6-7). Reported as of: 2026-10-16 | 12.8 |
| 4 | CNN-LSTM-Att-1s CNN-LSTM-Attention, 1 s segments (Zeynali et al. 2025) Evaluation detailsOriginal paper: trained on VitalDB (random 70/15/15 split), external test on the MUST (Kermani) dataset with 1 s peak-centred segments resampled to 100 Hz (Tables 6-7). Reported as of: 2026-10-16 | 13 |
| 5 | Mean baseline Mean-of-training-set baseline [reproduction] Evaluation detailsTrained on all VitalDB data, tested on the 67 MUST (Kermani) recordings (Supraja et al. 2026 out-of-distribution test). MUST glucose spans only 88-183 mg/dL, so mean prediction scores well; R² was below zero for every model. Reported as of: 2026-10-16 | 14.13 |
| 6 | XGBoost (Gupta) PPG features + XGBoost (Gupta et al. 2021 method) [reproduction] Evaluation detailsTrained on all VitalDB data, tested on the 67 MUST (Kermani) recordings (Supraja et al. 2026 out-of-distribution test). MUST glucose spans only 88-183 mg/dL, so mean prediction scores well; R² was below zero for every model. Reported as of: 2026-10-16 | 14.46 |
| 7 | ResNet34 (Zeynali) ResNet34 on raw 1 s PPG (Zeynali et al. 2025 method) [reproduction] Evaluation detailsTrained on all VitalDB data, tested on the 67 MUST (Kermani) recordings (Supraja et al. 2026 out-of-distribution test). MUST glucose spans only 88-183 mg/dL, so mean prediction scores well; R² was below zero for every model. Reported as of: 2026-10-16 | 14.99 |
| 8 | VGG16-1s VGG16, 1 s segments (Zeynali et al. 2025) Evaluation detailsOriginal paper: trained on VitalDB (random 70/15/15 split), external test on the MUST (Kermani) dataset with 1 s peak-centred segments resampled to 100 Hz (Tables 6-7). Reported as of: 2026-10-16 | 15 |
| 9 | 1D-CNN (Alghlayini) 1D-CNN on raw PPG (Alghlayini et al. 2023 method) [reproduction] Evaluation detailsTrained on all VitalDB data, tested on the 67 MUST (Kermani) recordings (Supraja et al. 2026 out-of-distribution test). MUST glucose spans only 88-183 mg/dL, so mean prediction scores well; R² was below zero for every model. Reported as of: 2026-10-16 | 16.56 |
Rows are ranked only within this task × dataset × metric. Protocols can differ; read each method's evaluation details before comparing. Latest reported row: 2026-10-16.
About the dataset
PPG Signals for Blood Glucose Measurement (Kermani / Mendeley)
- Subjects
- 23
- Signals
- ppg
- Licence
- CC BY 4.0
Related leaderboards
Other metrics on PPG Signals for Blood Glucose Measurement (Kermani / Mendeley)
Non-invasive glucose estimation on other datasets
Data and submissions
Download every leaderboard as JSON or CSV. Missing a published result? Email hello@chatppg.com with the paper link and the exact table it comes from.
Cite this
Cite the page URL and the date you accessed it. Please also cite the original publications listed above.
APA
ChatPPG. (2026). Kermani / Mendeley MARD leaderboard: non-invasive glucose estimation [Data set]. ChatPPG Research Hub. https://chatppg.com/research/leaderboards/glucose-estimation/ppg-bgl-kermani-mard-pct
BibTeX
@misc{chatppg_glucose_estimation_ppg_bgl_kermani_mard_pct,
author = {{ChatPPG}},
title = {{Kermani / Mendeley MARD leaderboard: non-invasive glucose estimation}},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
howpublished = {\url{https://chatppg.com/research/leaderboards/glucose-estimation/ppg-bgl-kermani-mard-pct}},
note = {ChatPPG Research Hub}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this resource, please cite it as below." type: dataset title: "Kermani / Mendeley MARD leaderboard: non-invasive glucose estimation" authors: - name: "ChatPPG" url: "https://chatppg.com/research/leaderboards/glucose-estimation/ppg-bgl-kermani-mard-pct" date-released: "2026-10-16"