BCoughBench: Benchmarking Respiratory Acoustic Foundation Models Under Body-Coupled Wearable Sensor Conditions

Sanap, Desikan, Lobaton. arXiv:2606.25116, arXiv published timestamp 2026-06-23T19:43:03Z. Carded 2026-11-08 from the arXiv export-API abstract.

• Form factor: body-coupled wearable (vs smartphone audio)

Respiratory acoustic foundation models (FMs) are benchmarked exclusively on smartphone recordings, yet clinical deployment increasingly targets body-coupled (BC) wearables whose sensors attenuate high-frequency content through tissue and bone, leaving FM reliability uncharacterised. We introduce BCoughBench, evaluating five FMs (OPERA-CT/CE/GT, HeAR, M2D+Resp) on nine classification tasks (AUROC, sensitivity at 95% specificity, Expected Calibration Error) and three age regression tasks (MAE vs. a mean-predictor baseline) across five EBEN-simulated BC sensor conditions on five labeled cough datasets. Mean AUROC declines from 0.785 (smartphone) to 0.689-0.723, degrading most under temple vibration pickup ( = -0.096) and least under the soft in-ear ( = -0.062). No FM meets the clinical sensitivity threshold (Se@Sp95 ≥ 0.20) on most disease tasks under any BC sensor. Sex classification on the CIDRZ cohort collapses (AUROC 0.954 to 0.596-0.628, = -0.341) while COVID detection is nearly unaffected ( = -0.004). Age regression is robust, improving under the forehead accelerometer on CoughVID (MAE 9.61 to 8.97 yr); HeAR leads on regression and demographic tasks, M2D+Resp on disease and characteristic tasks. BCoughBench provides a reproducible framework for FM evaluation under wearable conditions.

Verbatim from arXiv (opens in a new tab) · arXiv metadata (abstracts are released under CC0)

No results from this paper on ChatPPG leaderboards yet. Browse the leaderboards.