Device research record
Polar Verity Sense
Signals and sensors
From the device record. Fields the source does not state are left out.
- Maker
- Polar
- Form factor
- Arm
- Signals recorded
- Heart rate
What published studies show
Results quoted from 2 published validation studies, each against a clinical reference. A result applies to the model and protocol tested, not to every model the brand sells. From the wearable accuracy database (v1.0.0).
Heart rate during exercise2 studies
| Device tested | Result | Reference | Sample | Study |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polar Verity Sense | Strongest agreement (with WHOOP upper arm) in graded treadmillStudy finding (no single number) | ECG chest strap (Polar H7/H10) | n = 28, Rest, warm-up, burpees, Bruce treadmill | Moghaddam et al. (2025)Funding not reported |
| Polar Verity Sense | Significantly lower MAE than Polar Pacer Pro and Galaxy Watch 6Study finding (no single number) | ECG chest strap (Polar H7/H10) | n = 37, Low/moderate/high-intensity treadmill | Jeong et al. (2026)Independent |
- Polar Verity SenseStrongest agreement (with WHOOP upper arm) in graded treadmill
Study finding (no single number) · vs ECG chest strap (Polar H7/H10) · n = 28, Rest, warm-up, burpees, Bruce treadmill
Moghaddam et al. (2025) Funding not reported
- Polar Verity SenseSignificantly lower MAE than Polar Pacer Pro and Galaxy Watch 6
Study finding (no single number) · vs ECG chest strap (Polar H7/H10) · n = 37, Low/moderate/high-intensity treadmill
Jeong et al. (2026) Independent
Comparisons
Head-to-head comparisons for this brand.
Datasets recorded with this device
- MPMRD
Multi-Pace Multimodal Running Dataset (Huawei GT Runner watch + Polar Verity Sense + COSMED K5 + VICON)