Paperdoi:10.1088/1361-6579/ae85b4
Dynamic beat-to-beat blood pressure estimation using a multi-modal wearable deep learning approach
Physiological Measurement 47 (2026) 075013 (published 2026-07-27)
Licence: CC BY 4.0
Qiao Li et al., "Dynamic beat-to-beat blood pressure estimation using a multi-modal wearable deep learning approach", doi:10.1088/1361-6579/ae85b4, CC BY 4.0
TL;DR
Custom wearable with superficial temporal artery tonometry (STAT) for pressure-waveform morphology plus ECG and PPG; features: HR, PTT (ECG–PPG), STAT- and PTT-derived BP metrics, and SQIs for each signal. Temporal convolutional network on the multimodal features; leave-one-subject-out CV. MAD SBP 5.58 / MBP 4.39 / DBP 4.34 mmHg; significantly better than PTT-only and STAT-only baselines (Wilcoxon p < 0.05). Related earlier JBHI paper from an overlapping team: mcbp-net-beat-to-beat-bp-multimodal-cnn-lstm-jbhi-2025.
- Form factor: other
Abstract
Objective. Cuffless blood pressure (BP) monitoring technologies, primarily based on pulse transit time (PTT) or photoplethysmography (PPG), frequently suffer from calibration drift due to their reliance on blood volume surrogates rather than direct pressure measurement. To address this physiological limitation, this study presents a multi-modal deep learning framework that integrates superficial temporal artery tonometry (STAT), which captures high-fidelity pressure waveform morphology, with electrocardiography (ECG) and PPG signals. Approach. A custom wearable device was developed to simultaneously acquire these signals during dynamic perturbations. Extracted features included heart rate from ECG, PTT from ECG-PPG pairs, and BP-related metrics derived from PTT and STAT. Signal quality indices for ECG, PPG, and STAT signals were also computed to assess signal reliability. A temporal convolutional network (TCN) model was designed to capture the complex, non-linear dependencies between these multi-modal features and beat-to-beat BP. Main results. The approach was rigorously validated using leave-one-subject-out cross-validation on 29 recordings from ten healthy volunteers undergoing isometric handgrip exercises. The proposed TCN model significantly outperformed traditional PTT and STAT-only baselines, achieving a mean absolute difference of 5.58 mmHg for systolic BP , 4.39 mmHg for mean BP and 4.34 mmHg for diastolic BP. Notably, the TCN model exhibited significantly lower errors ( p
0.05, Wilcoxon Test) during dynamic BP fluctuations compared to baseline models. Significance. The study demonstrates that fusing tonometry-derived pressure morphology with hemodynamic timing features effectively mitigates the limitations of conventional PTT methods. This approach offers a robust solution for continuous, calibration-resilient BP estimation.
Verbatim from the publisher's DOI record (opens in a new tab) · Publisher licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Results on ChatPPG leaderboards
All leaderboardsNo results from this paper on ChatPPG leaderboards yet. Browse the leaderboards.
Tasks & signals
Tasks
Signals
Keywords
How it works
Cite this paper
APA
Li, Q., Shen, Z., Almadi, M., Yang, Y., Zhang, N., Gong, J., Strangman, G., Xiang, T., Zhang, Y., Clifford, G. D., & Zhang, Q. (2026). Dynamic beat-to-beat blood pressure estimation using a multi-modal wearable deep learning approach. Physiological Measurement 47 075013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ae85b4
BibTeX
@article{li2026dynamic,
title = {{Dynamic beat-to-beat blood pressure estimation using a multi-modal wearable deep learning approach}},
author = {Li, Qiao and Shen, Zichao and Almadi, Mohamed and Yang, Ye and Zhang, Ning and Gong, Jacqueline and Strangman, Gary and Xiang, Ting and Zhang, Yuanting and Clifford, Gari D. and Zhang, Quan},
year = {2026},
journal = {Physiological Measurement 47 075013},
doi = {10.1088/1361-6579/ae85b4}
}Built from the hub record. Check it against the publisher before submitting.
Added to the ChatPPG research hub