Paperdoi:10.3390/bioengineering10010101
Comparing Remote Speckle Plethysmography and Finger-Clip Photoplethysmography with Non-Invasive Finger Arterial Pressure Pulse Waves, Regarding Morphology and Arrival Time
Bioengineering 10(1):101, 2023
Jorge Herranz Olazabal et al., "Comparing Remote Speckle Plethysmography and Finger-Clip Photoplethysmography with Non-Invasive Finger Arterial Pressure Pulse Waves, Regarding Morphology and Arrival Time", doi:10.3390/bioengineering10010101, CC BY 4.0
TL;DR
Remote speckle plethysmography (SPG) from a camera and a 639 nm laser was compared with a clinical finger-clip PPG, using finger arterial pressure as the reference. Across 2,599 beats the SPG pulse shape matched the arterial pressure waveform about twice as closely as PPG (deviation 0.09 vs 0.17). Pulse arrival times were similar for both.
- Form factor: camera
Abstract
Objective: The goal was to compare Speckle plethysmography (SPG) and Photoplethysmography (PPG) with non-invasive finger Arterial Pressure (fiAP) regarding Pulse Wave Morphology (PWM) and Pulse Arrival Time (PAT). Methods: Healthy volunteers (n = 8) were connected to a Non-Invasive Blood Pressure (NIBP) monitor providing fiAP pulse wave and PPG from a clinical transmission-mode SpO2 finger clip. Biopac recorded 3-lead ECG. A camera placed at a 25 cm distance recorded a video stream (100 fps) of a finger illuminated by a laser diode at 639 nm. A chest belt (Polar) monitored respiration. All signals were recorded simultaneously during episodes of spontaneous breathing and paced breathing. Analysis: Post-processing was performed in Matlab to obtain SPG and analyze the SPG, PPG and fiAP mean absolute deviations (MADs) on PWM, plus PAT modulation. Results: Across 2599 beats, the average fiAP MAD with PPG was 0.17 (0–1) and with SPG 0.09 (0–1). PAT derived from ECG–fiAP correlated as follows: 0.65 for ECG–SPG and 0.67 for ECG–PPG. Conclusion: Compared to the clinical NIBP monitor fiAP reference, PWM from an experimental camera-derived non-contact reflective-mode SPG setup resembled fiAP significantly better than PPG from a simultaneously recorded clinical transmission-mode finger clip. For PAT values, no significant difference was found between ECG–SPG and ECG–PPG compared to ECG–fiAP.
Verbatim from the publisher's DOI record (opens in a new tab) · Publisher licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Results on ChatPPG leaderboards
All leaderboardsNo results from this paper on ChatPPG leaderboards yet. Browse the leaderboards.
Tasks & signals
Tasks
Signals
Keywords
How it works
- Wavelengths
- 639 nm
Cite this paper
Olazábal, J. H., Wieringa, F. P., Hermeling, E., & Van Hoof, C. A. (2023). Comparing Remote Speckle Plethysmography and Finger-Clip Photoplethysmography with Non-Invasive Finger Arterial Pressure Pulse Waves, Regarding Morphology and Arrival Time. Bioengineering , 2023, 10(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10010101
Olazábal, Jorge Herranz, Fokko Pieter Wieringa, Evelien Hermeling, and Chris A. Van Hoof. 2023. "Comparing Remote Speckle Plethysmography and Finger-Clip Photoplethysmography with Non-Invasive Finger Arterial Pressure Pulse Waves, Regarding Morphology and Arrival Time." Bioengineering , 2023 10 (1): 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10010101.
Olazábal, J. H., Wieringa, F. P., Hermeling, E. and Van Hoof, C. A. (2023) 'Comparing Remote Speckle Plethysmography and Finger-Clip Photoplethysmography with Non-Invasive Finger Arterial Pressure Pulse Waves, Regarding Morphology and Arrival Time', Bioengineering , 2023, 10(1), p. 101. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10010101.
Olazábal, Jorge Herranz, et al. "Comparing Remote Speckle Plethysmography and Finger-Clip Photoplethysmography with Non-Invasive Finger Arterial Pressure Pulse Waves, Regarding Morphology and Arrival Time." Bioengineering , 2023, vol. 10, no. 1, 2023, p. 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10010101.
J. H. Olazábal, F. P. Wieringa, E. Hermeling, and C. A. Van Hoof, "Comparing Remote Speckle Plethysmography and Finger-Clip Photoplethysmography with Non-Invasive Finger Arterial Pressure Pulse Waves, Regarding Morphology and Arrival Time," Bioengineering , 2023, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 101, 2023, doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10010101.
@article{olazabal2023comparing,
title = {{Comparing Remote Speckle Plethysmography and Finger-Clip Photoplethysmography with Non-Invasive Finger Arterial Pressure Pulse Waves, Regarding Morphology and Arrival Time}},
author = {Olazábal, Jorge Herranz and Wieringa, Fokko Pieter and Hermeling, Evelien and Van Hoof, Chris A.},
year = {2023},
journal = {Bioengineering , 2023},
volume = {10},
number = {1},
pages = {101},
doi = {10.3390/bioengineering10010101}
}Added to the ChatPPG research hub