Paperdoi:10.1093/sleep/zsx097

Validation of Photoplethysmography-Based Sleep Staging Compared With Polysomnography in Healthy Middle-Aged Adults

Venue listed2017Added Sep 26, 2026

  • PF
  • TW
  • MG
  • EM
  • MR
  • CS
  • LH
  • RA

Authors: Pedro Fonseca, Tim Weysen, Maaike S. Goelema, Els I.S. Møst, Mustafa Radha, Charlotte Lunsingh Scheurleer, Leonie van den Heuvel, Ronald M. Aarts (8 authors)

Sleep

TL;DR

Early clinical validation of automatic sleep staging from wrist PPG HRV plus accelerometer body movements vs PSG and actigraphy. Sleep-wake, 4-class (wake/N1+N2/N3/REM), and 3-class (wake/NREM/REM) classifiers trained on 135 simultaneous PSG+PPG recordings (101 healthy participants) and validated on 80 recordings. Foundational wrist PPG+ACC staging paper for consumer/clinical wearable lineage (Philips/related).

  • Form factor: wrist

Abstract

Study objectivesTo compare the accuracy of automatic sleep staging based on heart rate variability measured from photoplethysmography (PPG) combined with body movements measured with an accelerometer, with polysomnography (PSG) and actigraphy.MethodsUsing wrist-worn PPG to analyze heart rate variability and an accelerometer to measure body movements, sleep stages and sleep statistics were automatically computed from overnight recordings. Sleep-wake, 4-class (wake/N1 + N2/N3/REM) and 3-class (wake/NREM/REM) classifiers were trained on 135 simultaneously recorded PSG and PPG recordings of 101 healthy participants and validated on 80 recordings of 51 healthy middle-aged adults. Epoch-by-epoch agreement and sleep statistics were compared with actigraphy for a subset of the validation set.ResultsThe sleep-wake classifier obtained an epoch-by-epoch Cohen's κ between PPG and PSG sleep stages of 0.55 ± 0.14, sensitivity to wake of 58.2 ± 17.3%, and accuracy of 91.5 ± 5.1%. κ and sensitivity were significantly higher than with actigraphy (0.40 ± 0.15 and 45.5 ± 19.3%, respectively). The 3-class classifier achieved a κ of 0.46 ± 0.15 and accuracy of 72.9 ± 8.3%, and the 4-class classifier, a κ of 0.42 ± 0.12 and accuracy of 59.3 ± 8.5%.ConclusionsThe moderate epoch-by-epoch agreement and, in particular, the good agreement in terms of sleep statistics suggest that this technique is promising for long-term sleep monitoring, although more evidence is needed to understand whether it can complement PSG in clinical practice. It also offers an improvement in sleep/wake detection over actigraphy for healthy individuals, although this must be confirmed on a larger, clinical population.

Verbatim from Europe PMC (opens in a new tab) · Abstract via Europe PMC; © the authors/publisher

Results on ChatPPG leaderboards

All leaderboards

No results from this paper on ChatPPG leaderboards yet. Browse the leaderboards.

Tasks & signals

Tasks

Sleep staging

Signals

Keywords

sleepstagingwristPPG+ACCvalidationlandmark

How it works

How Method works: Setup → Method → TargetSetup: Signals (PPG, ACC); Form factor (wrist). Method: Method. Target: Sleep staging.SetupSignals: PPG, ACCSignalsPPG, ACCForm factor: wristForm factorwristMethodMethodTargetSleep stagingSleep staging

Cite this paper

APA

Fonseca, P., Weysen, T., Goelema, M. S., Møst, E. I., Radha, M., Scheurleer, C. L., van den Heuvel, L., & Aarts, R. M. (2017). Validation of Photoplethysmography-Based Sleep Staging Compared With Polysomnography in Healthy Middle-Aged Adults. Sleep. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsx097

BibTeX

@article{fonseca2017validation,
  title         = {{Validation of Photoplethysmography-Based Sleep Staging Compared With Polysomnography in Healthy Middle-Aged Adults}},
  author        = {Fonseca, Pedro and Weysen, Tim and Goelema, Maaike S. and Møst, Els I.S. and Radha, Mustafa and Scheurleer, Charlotte Lunsingh and van den Heuvel, Leonie and Aarts, Ronald M.},
  year          = {2017},
  journal       = {Sleep},
  doi           = {10.1093/sleep/zsx097}
}

Built from the hub record. Check it against the publisher before submitting.

Added to the ChatPPG research hub