Paperdoi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2026.101791

Automated cardiac arrest detection using wrist-derived photoplethysmography during withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment: a prospective clinical validation study

Venue listed2026Added Oct 21, 2026

  • RE
  • CJ
  • LP
  • KE
  • RK
  • ER
  • MB
  • RB
  • +3

Authors: Roos Edgar, Catharina E. Jansen, Lente R. Pol, Kambiz Ebrahimkheil, Ruud C. van Kaam, Eelko Ronner, Marc A. Brouwer, Rypko J. Beukema, Aysun Cetinyurek-Yavuz, Peter C. Stas,

+1 more…

The Lancet Regional Health – Europe (Aug 2026); PMCID PMC13427576

Licence: CC BY 4.0

TL;DR

Prospective single-centre ICU study, adults with planned withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment; CardioWatch 287-2 (Corsano) worn until death; multi-wavelength PPG (green, red, infrared), 32 or 128 Hz, streamed via Samsung Galaxy A40. Reference: continuous ECG + invasive arterial pressure. Prior rule-based model (DETECT-1A/1B, induced arrest) refined on two training cohorts, then tested on a separate cohort. Preprocessing: 2nd-order Butterworth 0.5–4 Hz, downsampled to 32 Hz.

  • Form factor: wrist

Abstract

BackgroundAutomated cardiac arrest detection and alerting using wearable technology has the potential to shorten recognition delays for unwitnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. In DETECT-1A and -1B, a photoplethysmography-based detection model was developed and validated in patients with induced cardiac arrest. This study evaluates model performance in true cardiac arrests following withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment.MethodsProspective, single-center study in adult ICU patients with planned withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. Patients wore a photoplethysmography-wristband (CardioWatch) until death. Continuous ECG and invasive arterial pressure served as reference standards. The previously developed rule-based algorithm was refined using two training cohorts and evaluated in a separate test cohort. Endpoints were sensitivity for cardiac arrest detection and false positive alerts.FindingsForty-four patients were included (training 1: n = 10; training 2: n = 11; test: n = 23), median age 65 years; 75% male, all with non-shockable cardiac arrest. Sensitivity for cardiac arrest detection was 100% (10/10; 95% confidence interval [CI] 66-100%) and 90% (9/10; 95% CI 54-99%), in training 1 and 2, respectively. In the test set, sensitivity was 100% (23/23; 95% CI 82-100%), with one false positive alert. Cardiac arrest was detected at a mean arterial pressure of 30 mmHg (IQR 24-35) and pulse pressure of 13 mmHg (IQR 11-19).InterpretationCardiac arrest can be detected with high sensitivity using wrist-derived photoplethysmography, providing first evidence on model performance in true cardiac arrest, specifically in non-shockable cases. Findings support further development of wearable-based cardiac arrest detection technologies to enable earlier recognition for unwitnessed cardiac arrest.FundingDutch Heart Foundation, Radboudumc.

Verbatim from Europe PMC (opens in a new tab) · Licence: cc by

Results on ChatPPG leaderboards

All leaderboards

No results from this paper on ChatPPG leaderboards yet. Browse the leaderboards.

Tasks & signals

Signals

Keywords

cardiac-arrestloss-of-pulsewrist-PPGmulti-wavelengthCorsanoICUDETECT-1Crule-basedinvasive-ABP-reference

How it works

How Method works: Setup → Method → TargetSetup: Signals (PPG); Wavelengths (green, red, ir); Form factor (wrist). Method: Method.SetupSignals: PPGSignalsPPGWavelengths: green, red, irWavelengthsgreen, red, irForm factor: wristForm factorwristMethodMethod
Wavelengths
green, red, ir

Cite this paper

APA

Automated cardiac arrest detection using wrist-derived photoplethysmography during withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment: a prospective clinical validation study. (2026). The Lancet Regional Health – Europe. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2026.101791

BibTeX

@article{edgarwristppgcar2026automated,
  title         = {{Automated cardiac arrest detection using wrist-derived photoplethysmography during withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment: a prospective clinical validation study}},
  year          = {2026},
  journal       = {The Lancet Regional Health – Europe},
  doi           = {10.1016/j.lanepe.2026.101791}
}

Built from the hub record. Check it against the publisher before submitting.

Added to the ChatPPG research hub