Paperdoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0135659

Digital photoplethysmography for assessment of arterial stiffness: repeatability and comparison with applanation tonometry

Venue listed2015Added Oct 29, 2026

  • EW
  • GO
  • PN
  • PO

Authors: Emma von Wowern, Gerd Östling, Peter M. Nilsson, Per Olofsson

PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0135659

First page or project page of “Digital photoplethysmography for assessment of arterial stiffness: repeatability and comparison with applanation tonometry” (opens in a new tab)

Emma von Wowern et al., "Digital Photoplethysmography for Assessment of Arterial Stiffness: Repeatability and Comparison with Applanation Tonometry", doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0135659, CC BY 4.0

TL;DR

Compares finger digital pulse-wave analysis (Meridian DPA) with SphygmoCor applanation tonometry in 112 pregnant and non-pregnant people. EEI, aging index and b/a showed good repeatability, with correlations above 0.70 to the augmentation index. The global aging index had the best repeatability and the best correlations with both AIx and PWV.

  • Form factor: finger

Abstract

IntroductionArterial stiffness is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and can be assessed by applanation tonometry by measuring pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (AIX) by pressure pulse wave analysis (PWA). As an inexpensive and operator independent alternative, photoelectric plethysmography (PPG) has been introduced with analysis of the digital volume pulse wave (DPA) and its second derivatives of wave reflections.ObjectiveThe objective was to investigate the repeatability of arterial stiffness parameters measured by digital pulse wave analysis (DPA) and the associations to applanation tonometry parameters.Methods and results112 pregnant and non-pregnant individuals of different ages and genders were examined with SphygmoCor arterial wall tonometry and Meridian DPA finger photoplethysmography. Coefficients of repeatability, Bland-Altman plots, intraclass correlation coefficients and correlations to heart rate (HR) and body height were calculated for DPA variables, and the DPA variables were compared to tonometry variables left ventricular ejection time (LVET), PWV and AIX. No DPA variable showed any systematic measurement error or excellent repeatability, but dicrotic index (DI), dicrotic dilatation index (DDI), cardiac ejection elasticity index (EEI), aging index (AI) and second derivatives of the crude pulse wave curve, b/a and e/a, showed good repeatability. Overall, the correlations to AIX were better than to PWV, with correlations coefficients >0.70 for EEI, AI and b/a. Considering the level of repeatability and the correlations to tonometry, the overall best DPA parameters were EEI, AI and b/a. The two pansystolic time parameters, ejection time compensated (ETc) by DPA and LVET by tonometry, showed a significant but weak correlation.ConclusionFor estimation of the LV function, ETc, EEI and b/a are suitable, for large artery stiffness EEI, and for small arteries DI and DDI. The only global parameter, AI, showed a high repeatability and the overall best correlations with AIX and PWV.

Verbatim from Europe PMC (opens in a new tab) · Licence: cc by

Results on ChatPPG leaderboards

All leaderboards

No results from this paper on ChatPPG leaderboards yet. Browse the leaderboards.

Tasks & signals

Tasks

Vascular age

Signals

Keywords

Arterial StiffnessRepeatabilityTonometrySDPTGAging Index

How it works

How Method works: Setup → Method → TargetSetup: Signals (PPG); Form factor (finger). Method: Method. Target: Vascular age.SetupSignals: PPGSignalsPPGForm factor: fingerForm factorfingerMethodMethodTargetVascular ageVascular age

Cite this paper

Cite this paper with the fields recorded here. Check it against the publisher before submitting.

von Wowern, E., Östling, G., Nilsson, P. M., & Olofsson, P. (2015). Digital photoplethysmography for assessment of arterial stiffness: repeatability and comparison with applanation tonometry. PLoS ONE. 2015, 10, e0135659. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135659
von Wowern, Emma, Gerd Östling, Peter M. Nilsson, and Per Olofsson. 2015. "Digital photoplethysmography for assessment of arterial stiffness: repeatability and comparison with applanation tonometry." PLoS ONE. 2015 10: e0135659. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135659.
von Wowern, E., Östling, G., Nilsson, P. M. and Olofsson, P. (2015) 'Digital photoplethysmography for assessment of arterial stiffness: repeatability and comparison with applanation tonometry', PLoS ONE. 2015, 10, p. e0135659. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135659.
von Wowern, Emma, et al. "Digital photoplethysmography for assessment of arterial stiffness: repeatability and comparison with applanation tonometry." PLoS ONE. 2015, vol. 10, 2015, p. e0135659. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135659.
E. von Wowern, G. Östling, P. M. Nilsson, and P. Olofsson, "Digital photoplethysmography for assessment of arterial stiffness: repeatability and comparison with applanation tonometry," PLoS ONE. 2015, vol. 10, p. e0135659, 2015, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135659.
@article{wowern2015digital,
  title         = {{Digital photoplethysmography for assessment of arterial stiffness: repeatability and comparison with applanation tonometry}},
  author        = {von Wowern, Emma and Östling, Gerd and Nilsson, Peter M. and Olofsson, Per},
  year          = {2015},
  journal       = {PLoS ONE. 2015},
  volume        = {10},
  pages         = {e0135659},
  doi           = {10.1371/journal.pone.0135659}
}

Added to the ChatPPG research hub