PaperarXiv:2610.35843

Dynamic heart rate variability for classification of arrhythmia burden (IQR-RMSSD)

Preprint2026Added Oct 27, 2026

  • BK
  • MW
  • SK

Authors: Brian Y. Kang, Michael Wacker, Steven S. Kang.

arXiv 2610.35843v1 (q-bio.QM, 26 Oct 2026)

TL;DR

Proposes IQRRMSSD, the interquartile range of window-level RMSSD over overlapping windows, as a dynamic HRV feature for classifying high vs low arrhythmia burden. 30-min manually annotated ECGs from 43 individuals; linear SVC; repeated stratified 5-fold CV; feature sets HR, HR+RMSSD, HR+IQRRMSSD, all three; burden thresholds 1% and 10%.

  • Form factor: ECG (30-min recordings; device not stated)

Abstract

Purpose: Heart rate variability (HRV) may provide information beyond heart rate (HR) for identifying arrhythmia burden, but the value of temporal HRV variation remains unclear. This study developed a dynamic HRV measure quantifying the interquartile range of window-level root mean square of successive RR-interval differences (IQRRMSSD) and evaluated its utility in classifying total abnormal-beat and premature ventricular contraction (PVC) burden compared with the conventional RR-based HRV measure, RMSSD. Methods: Manually annotated 30-minute ECG recordings from 43 individuals were analyzed using overlapping windows. A linear support vector classifier was used to classify individuals as having high or low arrhythmia burden, defined using 1% and 10% burden thresholds. Four feature sets were evaluated: HR alone, HR with RMSSD, HR with IQRRMSSD, and all three measures. Performance was assessed using repeated stratified five-fold cross-validation. Results: HRV-containing feature sets generally outperformed HR alone, depending on outcome and threshold. At the 1% threshold, IQRRMSSD showed particularly high sensitivity for total abnormal-beat and PVC burden (0.970 ± 0.064 and 0.882 ± 0.193, respectively). At the 10% threshold, conventional RMSSD showed the strongest overall discrimination, achieving a ROC-AUC of 0.947 for PVC burden. Combined features sometimes improved the sensitivity-specificity balance but not overall discrimination. Conclusion: These findings suggest that a conventional RR-based HRV measure is informative for elevated ectopic burden, while a dynamic HRV measure may provide complementary information for lower-burden abnormalities.

Verbatim from arXiv (opens in a new tab) · arXiv metadata (abstracts are released under CC0)

Results on ChatPPG leaderboards

All leaderboards

No results from this paper on ChatPPG leaderboards yet. Browse the leaderboards.

Tasks & signals

Tasks

AF / rhythm

Signals

Keywords

HRVRMSSDPVCectopic burdenarrhythmiaRR intervalsPRV transfer

How it works

How Method works: Setup → Method → TargetSetup: Signals (ECG (RR intervals)); Form factor (ECG (30-min recordings; device not stated)). Method: Method. Target: AF / rhythm.SetupSignals: ECG (RR intervals)SignalsECG (RR intervals)Form factor: ECG (30-min recordings; device not stated)Form factorECG (30-min recordings; device not…MethodMethodTargetAF / rhythmAF / rhythm

Cite this paper

APA

Kang, B. Y., Wacker, M., & Kang., S. S. (2026). Dynamic heart rate variability for classification of arrhythmia burden (IQR-RMSSD). arXiv 2610.35843v1. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.35843

BibTeX

@misc{kang2026dynamic,
  title         = {{Dynamic heart rate variability for classification of arrhythmia burden (IQR-RMSSD)}},
  author        = {Kang, Brian Y. and Wacker, Michael and Kang., Steven S.},
  year          = {2026},
  howpublished  = {arXiv 2610.35843v1},
  eprint        = {2610.35843},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv}
}

Built from the hub record. Check it against the publisher before submitting.

Added to the ChatPPG research hub