Task leaderboard

Emotion recognition (valence/arousal)

Last updated

Task leaderboard

Emotion recognition (valence/arousal)

1 reported result · Leaderboard page · Dataset details

Emotion recognition (valence/arousal): CEAP-360VR, Accuracy. Reported rankings; evaluation protocols may differ.
RankMethod & evaluationAccuracy↑ Higher is better
1CEAP-360VR

CEAP-360VR: A Continuous Physiological and Behavioral Emotion Annotation Dataset for 360° VR Videos

Evaluation details

Random Forest, 2 s segments, physiological features only (E4 EDA, IBI, HR, SKT, BVP), subject-independent LOSO (Table IV); weighted F1 0.6126

Label set: binary low/high valence (continuous annotation)

Reported as of: 2026-10-30

0.6569

One reported result is available; this is not a multi-method comparison. Rows are ranked only within this task × dataset × metric. Protocols can differ; read each method’s evaluation details before comparing.

All reported results for this task (4 benchmarks)

Rankings apply within each dataset and metric. Open evaluation details for differences in protocols.

CEAP-360VR: accuracy

Emotion recognition (valence/arousal): CEAP-360VR, Accuracy. Reported rankings; evaluation protocols may differ.
RankMethod & evaluationAccuracy↑ Higher is better
1CEAP-360VR

CEAP-360VR: A Continuous Physiological and Behavioral Emotion Annotation Dataset for 360° VR Videos

Evaluation details

Random Forest, 2 s segments, physiological features only (E4 EDA, IBI, HR, SKT, BVP), subject-independent LOSO (Table IV); weighted F1 0.6126

Label set: binary low/high valence (continuous annotation)

Reported as of: 2026-10-30

0.6569

GroupAffect-4: macro-F1

Emotion recognition (valence/arousal): GroupAffect-4, Macro-averaged F1. Reported rankings; evaluation protocols may differ.
RankMethod & evaluationMacro-averaged F1↑ Higher is better
1Pseudo-Label Augmentation for Affect Sensing in…

Pseudo-Label Augmentation for Affect Sensing in Small Collaborative Groups

Evaluation details

Known-team, test task T3; RBF-SVM on 49 physiology + eye-tracking window features (15 s); GP pseudo-labels + personality cosine weighting (A2); Table 7

Label set: 3-class SAM valence (train-fitted midpoint tertiles)

Reported as of: 2026-10-30

0.608

WARM-VR: macro-F1

Emotion recognition (valence/arousal): WARM-VR, Macro-averaged F1. Reported rankings; evaluation protocols may differ.
RankMethod & evaluationMacro-averaged F1↑ Higher is better
1Introducing WARM-VR

Introducing WARM-VR: Benchmark Dataset for Multimodal Wearable Affect Recognition in Virtual Reality

Evaluation details

E4 wrist BVP only, 60 s windows, CNN (tie CNN-Bi-GRU), subject-independent 5-fold CV; AUC 0.69 (Table 2)

Label set: binary low/high SAM valence

Reported as of: 2026-10-30

0.63

WESAD: macro-F1

Emotion recognition (valence/arousal): WESAD, Macro-averaged F1. Reported rankings; evaluation protocols may differ.
RankMethod & evaluationMacro-averaged F1↑ Higher is better
1Introducing WESAD, a Multimodal Dataset for…

Introducing WESAD, a Multimodal Dataset for Wearable Stress and Affect Detection

Evaluation details

Wrist physio (E4 BVP+EDA+TEMP) features, 60 s windows, 0.25 s shift, Random Forest, LOSO (15 subjects); accuracy 76.17%

Label set: 3-class baseline / stress / amusement

Reported as of: 2026-10-30

0.6633